Our CEO joined CNBC to discuss Student Housing in Africa

Africa's purpose-built student accommodation market is one of the most structurally compelling, and most systematically underfunded, real estate investment opportunities on the continent. Across Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa, tertiary enrolment is expanding at pace while institutional student housing supply remains critically insufficient. The gap between student population growth and bed supply reflects structural failures in capital formation, policy design, and product innovation that will compound over the next three decades as Africa's student population is projected to more than triple by 2050.

Key findings

• Nigeria’s public tertiary institutions accommodate fewer than 9% of its tertiary student population in on-campus housing. The remainder rely on fragmented, informal off-campus provision characterised by security risks and price distortion.
• South Africa controls approximately 91.8% of Africa's formal PBSA supply, driven by its deep capital markets, NSFAS government-backed rental demand, and a legislated minimum norms and standards framework.
• Kenya's Acorn Holdings has demonstrated that a REIT structure, anchored by DFI equity and a green bond listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange and London Stock Exchange, can mobilise institutional capital into student housing at scale. Acorn's portfolio has grown to in excess of 27 billion Kenyan Shillings with approximately 20,000 beds under management.
• The primary barrier to institutional deployment is development risk. Investors require structures that de-risk the construction and lease-up phases, with DFIs and blended finance vehicles functioning as critical first-movers.
• Closing the continental supply gap requires coordinated action across government, DFIs, local pension funds, universities, and private operators.
  

A continent-wide accommodation crisis

Africa's tertiary student population is expanding faster than the continent's housing infrastructure can accommodate it. This is a continent-wide structural condition, rooted in a policy shift that decoupled enrollment growth from residential capacity.

In Kenya, a 2003 policy change allowed universities to admit students beyond their bed capacity, on the assumption that students would source accommodation independently. Kenya's tertiary system now enrolls a minimum of 600,000 students, with a further 400,000 in Technical and Vocational Education and Training centres. The majority rely on informal accommodation that is inadequate in quality, safety, and suitability for academic life.

Nigeria's position is more acute. Tertiary institutions lack the capacity to house more than 9% of enrolled students. The remaining 91% are absorbed into an informal off-campus rental market characterised by excessive pricing, security risks, and environments structurally incompatible with productive study. Ghana exhibits an equivalent pattern.

South Africa is the exception. Its PBSA sector is mature, institutionally capitalised, and increasingly benchmarked against listed student housing vehicles in the United States and Europe. It controls approximately 90% of Africa's formal PBSA supply, underpinned by deep capital markets, NSFAS-backed rental demand, and a legislated norms and standards framework that provides investment-grade clarity on product specifications.

Why the supply gap persists

The gap persists because the economics of PBSA delivery in emerging African markets do not support institutional return thresholds without structural intervention. Three barriers drive this outcome.

Development risk carries a significant premium in markets with volatile construction costs and limited delivery certainty. In markets with a single academic intake per year, a one-month delivery delay renders a building vacant for twelve months, directly compressing investor returns.

Short-term lease structures are misread by capital providers. Many lenders treat student tenancies as short-duration, uncollateralised exposure. Evidence from mature markets challenges this: students who occupy a property in year one show a 60% retention rate the following year, equivalent in cash flow terms to a three-year contracted lease.

Affordability mechanisms are absent or underdeveloped outside South Africa. Without a government-backed demand subsidy, operators in Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya must bridge the gap between what students can pay and what institutionally acceptable accommodation costs to build and operate.

The structure of demand varies materially by market

Across all four markets, demand for PBSA is large, growing, and structurally visible. The relevant question for investors is how demand is structured, who the effective paying customer is, and whether that customer base can generate the revenue certainty required to support institutional financing.

Nigeria and Ghana: latent demand at scale

In Nigeria, on-campus bed capacity covers fewer than 9% of enrolled students. The remainder are absorbed into an informal rental market that is unregulated, unevenly distributed around campus perimeters, and structured around family-home subletting rather than purpose-built provision. Students face security risks, opaque pricing, and study environments incompatible with academic performance. Ghana exhibits the same pattern.

African families routinely prioritise educational investment, including quality housing, over other household expenditure. The willingness to pay exists; the supply at the right price point has not yet been built at sufficient scale.

Kenya: a parent-financed demand model

Kenya's market has a structural dynamic that sets it apart: the paying customer is the parent, and the consuming customer is the student. Product design must satisfy the student's preference for community, privacy, and academic suitability, while the value proposition communicated to the parent centres on safety and peace of mind.

Acorn Holdings has built its commercial model around this insight. Admission to Acorn's properties requires a student ID; the product is designed as a community-first environment that demonstrably improves study conditions. This positioning has proven effective in converting parental spending into structured, recurring revenue. The TVET sector, with approximately 400,000 students underserved by purpose-built provision, represents the most proximate growth opportunity.

South Africa: a tiered, government-co-funded structure

NSFAS, described by a member of parliament as the largest student financial grant programme in the world, supports close to one million students and provides a government-backed rental stream to PBSA operators whose properties meet accreditation standards.

This produces a tiered market: a high-end private-pay segment; a NSFAS-eligible segment where rental income is government-backed but capped at an annually set rate; a missing middle of students who fall outside NSFAS eligibility but cannot afford market-rate provision; and a lower-income segment with acute affordability constraints.

Since 2023, NSFAS rental rates have been reduced and payment regularity has declined, creating revenue pressure on existing portfolios and accelerating a pivot toward private-pay positioning. The principle of accreditation-linked demand subsidy is sound and transferable to other markets. Its design must be predictable, inflation-linked, and structured as a loan rather than a grant to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability.

Supply is concentrated in South Africa; nascent elsewhere

South Africa commands approximately 91.8% of Africa's formal PBSA bed supply, built over two decades of private investment anchored by government demand support and a well-regulated development environment. Kenya is the most advanced of the remaining three markets, driven by Acorn's activity since 2015. Nigeria and Ghana remain at the earliest stage of formalisation.

South Africa: the continent's benchmark

Eris Property Group's Rise Student Living platform has developed the largest single-phase student accommodation project in Africa at 3,081 beds, integrated with a 7,000 square metre retail centre. The South African Student Accommodation Impact Investments fund has deployed capital in excess of 6,000 beds, with 3,000 beds under construction and a further pipeline under development. Several larger operators are now exploring REIT and unlisted REIT structures, tracking the trajectory of listed student housing vehicles in the United States and Europe.

South Africa's construction and development market is well regulated and competitive, enabling cost-effective delivery with lower time-overrun risk, a critical advantage in a single-intake market where a one-month delay eliminates twelve months of revenue.

Kenya: institutional capital at scale

Acorn entered the Kenyan market in 2015, at a point when PBSA was not yet recognised as a distinct real estate asset class. Its commercial model treats student accommodation as a long-duration, community-anchored residential product, a framing that required sustained education of lenders and students alike.

In February 2021, Acorn established two REITs under Kenya's 2013 REIT regulations: a development REIT to fund construction, and an income REIT to own and operate completed assets. Both were anchored by DFI equity investors, whose rationale combined financial return with the impact credentials of addressing a documented social infrastructure gap. This structure resolved the duration mismatch between development capital and the long-hold requirements of institutional real estate.

Acorn subsequently issued the first green bond in East Africa, listed on both the Nairobi Securities Exchange and the London Stock Exchange, supported by a 50% guarantee from GuarantCo. Early repayment of the bond enhanced institutional credibility and opened access to debt financing from globally recognised tier-one commercial banks. Acorn's current portfolio exceeds 27 billion Kenyan Shillings with approximately 20,000 beds under management.

The replicable sequence is: first-mover operator builds credibility, anchors DFI equity, structures a REIT to separate development and income risk, then accesses mainstream debt capital markets as the track record accumulates.

Nigeria and Ghana: an early-stage supply base

Private sector operators are entering both markets, but the aggregate volume of purpose-built beds remains a negligible fraction of the student population. Supply is concentrated near the most commercially attractive urban campuses; students at regional and state-level institutions remain entirely dependent on informal provision.

Construction cost volatility, driven by FX depreciation and supply chain disruption, compresses development margins and extends payback periods. Operators are responding with cost innovation: shared facility maintenance by students, weekly bathroom allocation rotations that reduce cleaning costs while building community ownership, and metered energy consumption systems to manage electricity expenditure, typically the single largest operating cost in student accommodation.

Development risk: the binding constraint on supply growth

Across all four markets, investor risk perception is highest at the development stage and falls materially once a property is completed and stabilised. Eris Property Group has addressed this in South Africa by underwriting the capital cost of developments against its own development management fee, aligning developer and investor interests and eliminating cost overrun risk for the capital partner.

DFIs have been the most consistent providers of development-stage capital, attracted by the ESG credentials and measurable social impact of the asset class. Local pension fund participation is growing in South Africa but remains constrained by regulatory allocation limits, including a 5% ceiling in Kenya.

Our Outlook

Short-term outlook by market

South Africa is in a period of recalibration. The decline in NSFAS payment reliability since 2023 has created revenue pressure on accreditation-dependent portfolios and is accelerating a structural shift toward private-pay products. This transition improves long-term sector resilience by reducing single-channel revenue dependence.

Kenya is positioned for continued expansion. Acorn's established institutional capital relationships and first-mover brand equity support portfolio growth. The TVET sector and the broader East African region represent the most immediate growth vectors.

Nigeria and Ghana require enabling conditions before institutional capital can deploy at the scale the supply deficit demands. The priorities over the next two to three years are government tax incentives for PBSA, university head lease or guarantee frameworks, and the emergence of a credible multi-site operator platform capable of anchoring DFI capital.

Medium-term: Africa's demographic dividend

Africa's student population is projected to more than triple by 2050. The operators and capital structures established in the next decade will define who captures that growth.

Local pension funds are the most structurally important untapped capital source. They hold patient, local-currency capital that is duration-matched to student residential investment and immune to FX risk. Regulatory reform increasing permissible allocations to alternative real assets is a policy priority across all four markets. Kenya's retail investment product, VUKA, demonstrates that broader investor participation is achievable; uptake has been constrained by product sophistication rather than underlying appetite.

Our recommendations for developers coming into the market

• Institutional investors should prioritise markets with demonstrated operator track records and structural risk mitigation. Acorn's product in Kenya is the most immediately investable African PBSA opportunity outside South Africa. 
• In South Africa, target operators with diversified revenue streams that reduce NSFAS dependence. In Nigeria and Ghana, require blended finance structures that absorb first-loss development risk before committing capital.
• Developers and operators should treat speed to market as a primary competitive variable. A missed intake means twelve months of vacant revenue. Prioritise operational cost efficiency from design stage, and establish DFI relationships before capital is required.
• Development finance institutions should continue providing development-stage equity and guarantee structures. The GuarantCo green bond guarantee model in Kenya is directly replicable. Nigeria and Ghana are the priority markets for DFI intervention given the absence of any existing institutional capital framework.
• Governments should focus on three interventions: tax incentives for PBSA development; a minimum norms and standards framework adapted from South Africa's model, with flexibility for local innovation; and university head lease or occupancy guarantee programmes that anchor demand certainty for investors. Any national financial aid scheme should be structured as a loan rather than a grant, with inflation-linked and predictable annual rates.
• Universities should formalise endorsement of credible PBSA operators as preferred accommodation partners. Head lease commitments, even partial ones, reduce the investor risk premium and lower the cost of capital for adjacent developments, which ultimately reduces the price students pay.
• Local pension funds should engage existing PBSA operators to build asset class understanding ahead of regulatory reform. The 60% year-one student retention rate, equivalent to a three-year effective lease, directly addresses duration and credit quality concerns.

Closing the continental supply gap requires simultaneous progress on four fronts: government incentive design, DFI and blended finance de-risking, pension fund regulatory reform, and operator platform development. Multi-stakeholder coalitions will determine which markets move first.

‍